In a May 2026 opinion piece for Florida’s Voice, Angela de Céspedes argues that the question about Cuba’s liberation is when, not whether — and that Florida should be preparing now.
Angela de Céspedes writes as a descendant of Carlos Manuel de Céspedes, who declared Cuba’s independence from Spain in 1868 and is remembered on the island as el Padre de la Patria. Her op-ed, published in Florida’s Voice on May 14, 2026, begins with that inheritance and with a conviction that liberty is not handed down by regimes but, in her words, “taken back by free people.” The piece is not a lament. It is a planning document.
Her argument is that Florida — ninety miles away, and home to the largest Cuban community outside Cuba — is the natural place from which a post-regime recovery would be organized, and that the state should build the institutions for that day before it arrives. She proposes three concrete steps. First, a Florida–Cuba free-enterprise bridge that puts the state’s ports, universities, and banks to work facilitating trade and entrepreneurship. Second, legal architecture: Florida’s Cuban-American lawyers and scholars should be drafting model commercial codes and property-title frameworks now, and preparing the judicial training a rebuilt legal system would need, so that the rule of law can be restored quickly rather than improvised. Third, human infrastructure — professional exchange programs and mentorship networks — so that what Florida offers is expertise, not only aid.
The through-line is practical: sentiment alone will not rebuild a country, but preparation and institutional readiness can. For a Miami-based trial lawyer whose practice already spans government counseling and cross-border disputes, it is a natural subject, and a personal one.
The views expressed in the op-ed are Angela’s own.
Read the op-ed: Cuba’s freedom will require Florida’s leadership — Angela C. de Céspedes, Florida’s Voice (Opinion), May 14, 2026
Publication spotlights summarize work our attorneys have published elsewhere; the views expressed in the original pieces are the authors’ own. Insights posts are offered for general information and are not legal advice.





